I am Associate Professor at the Department of Philosophy in the University of Campinas (Unicamp), Brazil (since ; tenured in ; Associate since ) . I am professor of the Department of Philosophy at the University of Campinas, Brazil. My main interest is Aristotle’s philosophy, especially his. Lucas Angioni. University of Campinas. Abstract. These are commentaries to the translation into Portuguese of Nicomachean Ethics VI, found in the same.
|Published (Last):||11 May 2009|
|PDF File Size:||10.66 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||2.6 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Drag to reposition
This paper discusses whether there is room for knowledge of causal relations between events in Aristotle’s theory of science as developed in the Posterior Analytics. Aristotle’s Topics and Analytics: Feb 10, Publication Name: A Problem for Hpc Theory and a Solution.
Gadamer and the Reception of Aristotle’s Intellectual Virtues. I discuss the notion of “kata sumbebekos knowledge”, which is a foil alluded to by Aristotle to define the notion of scientific knowledge in Posterior Analytics 71b I discuss in this paper the six requirements Aristotle advances at Posterior Analytics A-2, 71b, for the premisses of a scientific demonstration.
In what sense is character virtue more exact than craft? The translation, which was made at from on older llucas published inis preliminary and its publication was intended to provide a didactic tool for courses as well as a provisional resource in research seminars. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy. I examine each meander of Aristotle’s effort to identify several uses of key philosophical terms in his Metaphysics, V.
Works by Lucas Angioni – PhilArchive
I will focus on how this passage coheres with the remaining parts of the same chapter, which also are advancing methodological remarks. My area is Ancient Philosophy especially Aristotle. This chapter argues in favour of three interrelated points. Apr Publication Name: The translation, which was made at from on older version published inis preliminary and The definiens is taken to have only two importantly informative parts: First published in Consequently, this factor is also unique.
Lucas Angioni, As quatro causas na filosofia da natureza de Aristóteles – PhilPapers
Lucas Angioni University of Campinas. This approach gives a coherent interpretation of each step in the chapter. I claim that the contrast can only be understood in terms of explanatory relevance. Remarks on a Structural Account of Scientific Explanation.
University of Campinas Conference End Date: I claim that scientific knowledge of p requires knowing p by its appropriate cause, and that this appropriate cause is a universal katholou in the restricted sense Aristotle proposes in 73b ff.
The context of the argument The “necessary items” anhioni middle terms or explanatory factors that are necessary for the fully appropriate explanation.
When Aristotle says that demonstration must proceed from necessary principles, he means that each demonstration requires the Jul Publication Name: Aristotle’s contrast is formulated in terms of understanding or not understanding some “necessary items”. The second half of Posterior Analytics A. Using PhilArchive from home?
Aristotle rather ascribes to substances a priority in terms of completion, whereas he ascribes to substances-of-something some specific sort of causal-explanatory priority. Knowledge and Opinion about the same thing in APo A more.
It is reasonable to say that a definition must give a complete enumeration of the relevant features of lucaz definiendum,