Political theory and the multicultural society. Bhikhu parekh. Cultural diversity in modern societies takes many forms, of which three are most common. First. Bhikhu Parekh’s Rethinking Multiculturalism: Cultural Diversity and Political Theory sets out to design paths for multiculturalism understood both as political. Kelly, Paul () Situating Parekh’s multiculturalism: Bhikhu Parekh and twentieth-century British political theory. In: Uberoi, Varun and.
| Author: | Tojakus Samulkree |
| Country: | Nicaragua |
| Language: | English (Spanish) |
| Genre: | Politics |
| Published (Last): | 17 April 2004 |
| Pages: | 413 |
| PDF File Size: | 4.70 Mb |
| ePub File Size: | 12.30 Mb |
| ISBN: | 277-9-50840-305-8 |
| Downloads: | 89221 |
| Price: | Free* [*Free Regsitration Required] |
| Uploader: | Kazrajar |
Third, contemporary multicultural societies have emerged against the background of nearly three centuries of the culturally homogenizing nation-state. It also assumed a culturally neutral and socially transcendental state, able to ensure political impartiality, and did not anticipate that a determined majority might culturally monopolise the state and use it to enforce a narrow vision of India. One of the things which makes the book so valuable is that it is written by a political theorist who has had hands-on experience of the problems involved, and in more than one country.
It is a strength of this work that Parekh not only develops a brilliantly conceived theory of multiculturalism, but applies that theory meaningfully to thorny policy questions.
C ommitment or belonging is reciprocal in nature. Lawrence Blum – – Journal of Moral Education 43 3: Alexa Actionable Analytics for the Web.
A similar danger exists in a culturally plural society, in which the allegedly neutral state can easily become a vehicle of enshrining the domination of a particular cultural community. Culture is the belief or view human beings create regarding the significance of human life, and in close proximity different views and sets of beliefs are created.
Parekh’s style and tone exemplifies the dialogic attitude whose importance he also theorizes substantively in the book.
Rethinking Multiculturalism Cultural Diversity and Political Theory
Even such affluent, stable and politically mature democracies as the U. Skip to content Political theory and the multicultural society Bhikhu parekh Cultural diversity in modern societies takes many forms, of which three are most common.
Toleration, Respect and Recognition: It creates and defines multiculturalism in the form of political theory as well as political practice in the modern era, being based on Parekh’s experience of Multiculturalism in British society as well as other areas around the world. Its influence in Japan can be seen from the Japanese constitution of AD stating ” Decisions on important matters should not be made by a person alone.
Difference Recognition, National Cohesion and Equality. Political cultures, cultural politics Whatever their differences, contemporary multicultural societies raise several common and novel questions relating to the cultural rights of minorities, the nature of collective rights, the rights and obligations of immigrants, the ways of accommodating dual diasporic loyalties, the variety of the level and forms of citizenship, whether all cultures deserve equal respect, whether they should be judged in their own terms, or ours, or universal standards, how we can communicate across and resolve deep differences between cultures, and so forth.
These items are shipped from and sold by different sellers.
Other disagreement stems from Parekh’s inability to address concepts of democracy, liberalism, citizenship and nation being from anywhere other than western politics. Since the multicultural movement sprang up unplanned in many different political contexts, attracted a diverse cluster of groups, and has so far failed to throw up a coherent philosophical statement of its central principles, it lacks a clear focus and identity. Thanks to the dynamics of the modern economy, their constituent communities cannot lead isolated lives and are caught up in a complex pattern of interaction with each julticulturalism and the wider society.
Bhikhu Parekh, What is multiculturalism
Some groups of people might refuse to see themselves as individuals or as individuals only, and might press for communal or collective rights. Buy the selected items together This item: The modern state represents a very different view of social unity.
A Commitment to Cultural Pluralism”. The American Whites, for example, take a demeaning view of Blacks partly under the influence of the multivulturalism culture, partly because this helps them justify the prevailing system of domination, and partly because the deeply disadvantaged Blacks do sometimes exhibit some of the features that confirm White stereotypes.
If any of its constituent units had different needs and required different kinds of rights, the demand was deemed to violate the principle of equality, and was either rejected or conceded with the greatest reluctance. The same tendency leads them to divide all ways of life into liberal and non-liberal, to equate the latter with illiberal, and to bhimhu of tolerating and rarely of respecting or cherishing them. Parekh presents a model of how to think when trying to find a solution and demonstrates the application of the model to the following issues in great detail, female circumcision, polygamy, Muslim and Jewish methods of slaughtering animals, arranged marriages, scarring of children’s cheeks, Muslim practice of withdrawing their school-going girls from sports that expose parts of their bodies, Muslim girls wearing the heap or headscarf in schools, Sikh refusal to wear helmets rather than their traditional turbans when driving motor cycles, requests by Hindus to cremate mylticulturalism deceased on a funeral pyre and the subordinate status of women including the denial of opportunities for their personal development chapter 9.
East Dane Designer Men’s Fashion. Culturalism, the second strand of thought articulated by some of the Sophists, Vico, Herder and the German Romantics, made the opposite move.
However, they can be defined in several different ways, of which the liberal is only one and not always the most coherent. Joleen Steyn-Kotze – – Theoria: Writing from both within the liberal tradition and outside of it as a critic, he challenges what he calls the “moral monism” of much of traditional moral philosophy, including contemporary liberalism–its tendency to assert that only one way of life or set of values is worthwhile and to dismiss the rest as misguided or false.
mulgiculturalism Cultural diversity in modern societies takes many forms, of which three are most common. Pareky Second Chance Pass it on, trade it in, give it a second life. It might respond to its cultural plurality in one of two ways, each of which is in turn capable of taking several forms.
This does not mean that they are determined by their culture in the sense of being unable to rise above its categories of thought and critically evaluate its values and system of meaning, but rather that they are deeply shaped by it, can overcome some but not all of its influences, and necessarily view the world from within a culture, be it the one they have inherited and uncritically accepted or reflectively revised or, in rare cases, one they have consciously adopted.
Two Versions of the Fragmentation Objection. While different citizens would develop different emotions towards their community, what is necessary to sustain it and can legitimately be expected of them is a basic commitment to its integrity and well-being, what one might call patriotism or political loyalty.
Individuals who carry their own culture disturb relationships of power that in return culture has previously been established In. They split up humankind into different cultural units, and could not give a coherent account of how human beings were able to communicate across and even evaluate the customs and practices of other cultures.